Methodology | The project adopts a mixed-methods, longitudinal and multi-level methodological approach aimed at producing robust empirical evidence on and from within social intervention practices in contexts of complex social vulnerability. It is conceived as an integrative meta-project designed to analytically articulate and reconfigure the research projects currently being developed within CLISSIS through the construction of a common theoretical and methodological framework capable of ensuring comparability, cumulative knowledge production and scientific coherence.
In a first phase, the project will undertake a process of conceptual integration and theoretical development based on a systematic review of the international literature on practice-based evidence, impact assessment and complex social vulnerability. In parallel, ongoing CLISSIS projects will be mapped and analysed to identify convergences, specificities and gaps, thereby enabling the construction of an integrative analytical framework. This framework will function as the central theoretical and methodological device for understanding and operationalising Social Work intervention, articulating relational, contextual and structural dimensions.
In a second phase, the project will focus on methodological harmonisation and the operationalisation of common instruments, a key condition for the scientific integration of the different sub-projects. Shared methodological protocols will be developed, including the definition of vulnerability, intervention and impact indicators, as well as the design of comparable data collection tools, such as interview guides, observation grids and analytical devices incorporating endogenous professional knowledge. This process will be carried out in close collaboration with the teams of the different research groups, ensuring both methodological consistency and respect for the specificities of each study context.
The third phase corresponds to the empirical component of the project and is organised around an embedded multiple-case study strategy, taking as units of analysis the intervention projects and contexts already developed within CLISSIS. This approach will make it possible to capture the diversity of vulnerability configurations and intervention modalities, transforming such diversity into a source of analytical comparability. Data collection will combine qualitative and quantitative techniques, including semi-structured interviews with practitioners and service users, focus groups, non-participant and participant observation of intervention practices, self-confrontation interviews and institutional document analysis. A purposive and diversified sample will be selected, encompassing different areas of social intervention, such as ageing, gender, childhood and social policy, across diverse organisational contexts.
In the fourth phase, an integrated analysis of the data will be undertaken through methodological triangulation strategies, combining qualitative approaches—including conversational analysis, thematic analysis and grounded theory-inspired methods—with quantitative analysis, whenever appropriate, through the development and examination of impact indicators. This phase aims not only to describe intervention practices but also to assess their effectiveness and consistency, thereby enabling the empirical validation of the Practice-Based Evidence Framework developed by the project. Validation will be further strengthened through participatory processes involving practitioners, experts and other relevant stakeholders, ensuring the relevance and applicability of the results. The innovative nature of the project lies precisely in its capacity to transform ongoing research projects into integrated empirical units while simultaneously functioning as laboratories for methodological validation. This strategy makes it possible to overcome the fragmentation of research, promoting cumulative knowledge production and consolidating a coherent scientific programme in the field of Social Work. The researcher to be recruited will play a central role in this process, ensuring the coordination of methodological harmonisation activities, the implementation of fieldwork, the production and systematisation of data, and support for international scientific outputs. As such, the position will be instrumental in integrating the different levels of research and transforming empirical diversity into robust scientific evidence. All ethical principles governing social science research will be strictly observed, including informed consent, data anonymisation and protection, and the safeguarding of vulnerable populations, in accordance with national and European regulations. Overall, this methodology will enable not only the production of high-quality scientific knowledge but also the development of a Practice-Based Evidence Framework and of replicable methodological tools, contributing to the strengthening of Social Work practice and to the positioning of CLISSIS as a leading centre for applied research in Portugal. In addition, the project incorporates monitoring and quality-control mechanisms throughout all stages of the research process, ensuring the consistency and robustness of the data produced. The methodological strategy explicitly acknowledges the complexity and heterogeneity of intervention contexts, adopting procedures of triangulation, cross-validation and iterative refinement of analytical instruments. This approach will mitigate risks associated with empirical diversity while strengthening the reliability of the findings. Furthermore, the project design emphasises the scalability and transferability of the knowledge produced, ensuring that the Practice-Based Evidence Framework and the methodological tools developed can be applied across a variety of institutional settings and utilised in future research. In this way, the methodology not only guarantees the production of scientifically robust practice-based evidence but also supports the continuity and expansion of CLISSIS's research programme.
|
Period
|
Activity
|
Deliverable
|
|
Jan-Mar 2027
|
Mapping of ongoing CLISSIS research projects and engagement with project coordinators and research teams
|
D1. Inventory of existing research projects and research contexts
|
|
Mar-Jun 2027
|
Alignment meetings, definition of inclusion criteria, and eligibility assessment of participating projects
|
D2. Report on characterization, eligibility and integration of participating projects
|
|
Apr-Jun 2027
|
Systematic literature review and conceptual integration
|
D3. State-of-the-art report and integrative analytical framework
|
|
Jul-Sep 2027
|
Workshops and focus groups with researchers and practitioners to support methodological harmonization
|
D4. Preliminary theoretical-methodological model for practice-based evidence intervention
|
|
Jul-Oct 2027
|
Development of shared indicators and data collection instruments
|
D5. Shared methodological protocol and harmonized research instruments
|
|
Oct-Dec 2027
|
Operational planning, institutional authorizations, ethics submission procedures and preparation of fieldwork
|
D6. Fieldwork implementation plan, ethical approval obtained, and institutional authorizations secured
|
|
Jan 2028
|
Mid-term scientific monitoring seminar and presentation of the empirical research plan
|
D7. Mid-term scientific monitoring seminar completed
|
|
Feb-Apr 2028
|
Mapping of national and international funding opportunities and identification of strategic partners
|
D8. Strategic funding and internationalization plan
|
|
Jan-Jun 2028
|
Interviews, observation, document analysis and focus groups within case studies
|
D9. Integrated research database and empirical corpus
|
|
Jun-Sep 2028
|
Integrated data analysis and methodological triangulation
|
D10. Comparative analysis report of case studies
|
|
Sep-Oct 2028
|
Validation focus groups involving practitioners, researchers and stakeholders
|
D11. Empirically validated practice-based evidence intervention model
|
|
Oct-Nov 2028
|
Development of transferable tools for professional practice
|
D12. Intervention guide and impact assessment indicator system
|
|
Oct-Nov 2028
|
Participation in international scientific networks and conferences
|
D13. Scientific paper presented at an international conference
|
|
Nov-Dec 2028
|
International scientific dissemination
|
D14. Scientific article on the theoretical model of practice-based evidence submitted to an indexed international journal
|
|
Nov-Dec 2028
|
International scientific dissemination
|
D15. Scientific article on the empirical validation of the intervention model submitted to an indexed international journal
|
|
Jan 2029
|
Organization of Scientific Conference on Social Intervention and Complex Vulnerabilities
|
D16. Scientific Conference held and conference proceedings published
|
|
Jan-Mar 2029
|
Pilot implementation and monitoring of the developed instruments in participating organizations
|
D17. Monitoring and refinement report on intervention and evaluation instruments
|
|
Apr-Jun 2029
|
Longitudinal assessment of outcomes and complementary data collection
|
D18. Longitudinal evaluation report on intervention processes and impacts
|
|
Jun-Sep 2029
|
Consolidation of national and international research networks and preparation of collaborative funding proposals
|
D19. Consolidated research network and funding opportunity portfolio
|
|
Jul-Oct 2029
|
Advanced methodological workshop for researchers and practitioners
|
D20. Advanced training workshop delivered and training materials produced
|
|
Sep-Nov 2029
|
Preparation and submission of competitive national and international funding applications
|
D21. Submission of at least two competitive funding proposals
|
|
Sep-Nov 2029
|
Final scientific production
|
D22. Scientific article on impact, transferability and sustainability of the intervention model submitted to an indexed international journal
|
|
Oct-Dec 2029
|
Final systematization of results, project closure and strategic planning for future research
|
D23. Final scientific and technical report, closing seminar, and CLISSIS Research Strategy 2030-2033, including a scientific agenda, partnership network and pipeline of future funding applications
|
|